|
Vol. 1 - No. 5 |
May, 1982 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
The Existence of God: Reasonable Thinking by Lloyd Clark |
||||||||||||||
|
Those of us who believe in God have no difficulty
finding evidence to support our belief in not only God's word, the Bible,
but also in nature. Yet there are those who deny the existence of God,
and must deal only with the realm of human experience to explain the
origin of man and the universe. Since infidels reject all notions of the
existence of God, they also reject the Bible as being His inspired word
delivered to us. If we are ever to convince these of the reality of God,
we must fight them on their own ground-human learning-because they will
listen to nothing else. So, setting our Bibles aside for the moment, let
us appeal to the realm of human experience for the answers to three
dilemmas concerning the existence of physical life as we know it. In each
case, we must decide what is most reasonable to believe, based only on
the facts gained from human experience. First of all we
must decide: Either (1) Something exists, or (2) Nothing exists. As far as
I know, these are our only two alternatives. To make your decision, choose
any object at hand-a book, pencil, car, etc.-and ask "Does this exist?".
We certainly have no difficulty in determining that, indeed, something
surely exists! If asked about the matter, we can now say with confidence
that something does exist. Thus, we rule out option #2 as being too
unreasonable to believe. We now move on to a slightly more difficult
alternative. Since something does exist, then either: (1) Something
came from nothing, or (2) Something has always existed. As far as I know,
no one can prove that something has always existed. I can not, at any
rate. But since there are only two alternatives, and since never in all of
human experience has anything ever been observed to come from nothing, the
second alternative must be accepted as being most reasonable! Scientists
themselves agree with this. The fact that no object has ever been observed
to come from nothing is so consistently true that it has been written as
scientific law in two different ways: 1. The First Law of Thermodynamics: The total amount of
all matter & energy can not be increased or decreased, even though it may
be changed in form. Water is a good example of this scientific law. Though
one gallon of water may "swell" or increase in size when frozen, you still
have but one gallon of water. The same applies if extreme heat is applied
and the water vaporizes, forming a cloud. Though but a mist and barely
visible, if the entire cloud could be re-captured and condensed, you would
still have one gallon of water. 2. The Law of Biogenesis: Living things come only from
other living things like themselves. The law of Biogenesis is evident in every living
creature. Two elephants have yet to mate and produce a giraffe. Never will
two mosquitoes have birth to an ostrich. Nor will two gorillas ever be
"mom & dad" to a human baby. Elephants reproduce elephants, mosquitoes
give us other mosquitoes, and so on. This is "nature's way." And in NO
CASE has an elephant, or anything else, ever just "popped" into existence.
They came from other elephants. When asked "Which came first the chicken
or the egg?", we give the most reasonable answer-the chicken. This fits
into the laws of science. Thus, the most reasonable choice to our second
dilemma is that something has always existed. We use the word "eternal" to
describe things which have always existed. This brings us to our third and
final problem. Since something has always existed, then either: (1)
That something is physical, or (2) That something is not physical
(spiritual). There is no evidence or information in existence that would
oppose the idea of some spiritual existence being eternal, but there is
much evidence-scientific evidence-which tells us physical things can not
be eternal. The fact that physical matter decays and breaks down, that
physical motion slows, that order becomes disorder, and that entropy
surely increases is so consistently observed to be true without exception
that it, too, has been written as scientific law-The Second Law of
Thermodynamics. Infidel, pseudo-scientists quickly point out that this law
only applies in a closed system, where no outside source of energy is
allowed to contribute. But we should note that the physical universe is,
by definition, a closed system. Could our physical, running down universe
have existed eternally? Could it run down eternally? Sir Isaac Newton
said: "I have observed that, without exception (emphasis mine, LC) hot
objects warm cold objects until their temperatures become equal. In the
universe I see some very hot objects and some very cold objects.
Therefore, I conclude that the universe can not be very old." It certainly
is not eternal! Scientists tell us our sun converts 200,000,000 tons of
hydrogen into helium each second, and that 4,500,000 million tons of its
mass is lost each second in the process! Could our physical sun have been
burning eternally? Of course not. We see then that physical things, without exception,
cannot be eternal. This being so, we must conclude, as the most reasonable
alternative, that that which has always existed is "not physical," which
we call "spiritual." This spiritual, eternal being, whom we call God, has
extreme power, demonstrated by the things He has made. Consider the size
of the earth, the size of the sun, and the size and workings of the entire
universe. Have you ever wondered how all those stars and planets are able
to float around in space, constantly moving at thousands of miles per
hour, yet never colliding with each other? Have you ever taken the time to
marvel at the fact that our ordinary calendars and clocks are patterned
after and kept pace with the revolutions of the planets around our sun,
and the rotation of our earth? This entire universe is one big clock with
a day/date calendar to boot! Observe the two lists below.
The list on the left shows some of God's creations. The list on the right shows man's inventions, built by men who observed God's creations and imitated some of them in a crude way. These crude copies proclaim man's intelligence and engineering abilities, and everyone recognizes that these crude efforts show evidence of designers and builders. Yet some, while dumbfounded and awestruck by these simple, gross imitations, simply write off God's complex, non-duplicatable, original creations as mere accidents products of chance! We have not the space to discuss the great complexities of these, God's creations, and then compare them with man's crude copies. Yet, after contemplating the facts, it is reasonable to insist that these are only accidents??? When we deal strictly with the facts we find that: (1) Something Exists, (2) Something has always existed, (3) That something which has always existed is not physical, but spiritual... (4) A Being we call God. You, dear reader, must make your decision. Our hope is that you will continue to look only at the facts-not speculation, and believe that which is most reasonable. |
|||||||||||||||