|
|
|
Demas is one of those despised men of the
New Testament. It
is difficult to find any who praise him after Paul's imprisonment. At this time, Paul remarked, For Demas hath
forsaken me, having loved this present world, and is departed
unto Thessalonica... 2 Timothy 4:10.
Such a horrible shortcoming to forsake one during the
time of special need. One certainly needs
courage to stand against the wiles of the Devil (Ephesians 6:10). The word of God will enable any who permit
it free course in our lives.
What caused Demas to forsake Paul? Not lack of courage, but a lust for materialism
seemed to be his downfall (Zondervan 2:92).
...When Demas came up to the great capital of the then
known world in company with the Lords prisoners, Paul and Epaphras,
it was a different story.
He was not a prisoner, and gradually the contrast between
the cell and the outer world became intolerable to him.
He saw the magnificent halls of the Caesars, the gorgeous
homes of the rich and the glitter of a world of music, venal
loves, jest and wine. Such a gay world cast
its glamour over Demas, and he yielded to its charms. The prison where his friends were languishing
seemed wretched alongside the musichaunted, scented, dazzling
halls of Rome (Lockyer, All the Men of the Bible, pgs 9192).
Macknight records that some supposed that Demas ...apostatized to heathenism, and became
an Idolpriest. But of this there is
no evidence, as the apostles Paul does not insinuate that he
renounced the gospel.
Jesus had commanded the apostles, Matthew 10:23 But when they persecute
you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto
you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the
Son of man be come. Jesus had taught the
disciples not to cast pearls before swine (Matthew 7:6); and
when those a city would not receive them, shake the dust from
off their feet (Matthew 10:14). When people to not receive
truth and begin to persecute, flee to a more receptive place.
I feel that it is unwarranted to single Demas out for the evil of having forsaken
Paul and due to love for this present world.
That is taking the statement totally out of context and
makes it teach a possible error.
Demas went to Thessalonica, Crescens to Galatia, and Titus
to Dalmatia! No one says that Crescens
and/or Titus forsook the gospel.
Did they all forsake Paul?
Yes! Only Luke is with me,
Paul replied.
Paul is about to die for the faith. Possibly all those who were with him would
be put to death. This
would end the life work of those of such fate.
The context implies that Demas, Crescens and Titus desired
to live a little longer, they were not ready to die for the faith,
they loved this present world.
Jesus had warned his disciples to flee the city when persecution
came upon them (Matthew 10:23), go to another area and preach.
It is not said that Demas loved the world; but that he
loved this present world.
He desired to live!
When Paul came to Corinth, he found a certain Jew named
Aquilla, born in Pontus, lately come from Italy, with his wife
Priscilla; (because that Claudius had commanded all Jews to depart
from Rome:) and came to them (Acts 18:12).
Had Aquilla and Priscilla loved this present world?
Why did they not stay in Rome and die for the faith?
The attempt to make Demas appear in a wrong light is a
forced opinion upon a passage of scripture.
Demas loved
life and desired good days.
He was not ready to lay down his spiritual armor.
He went to Thessalonica, Crescens to Galatia, and Titus
to Dalmatia! They loved this present
world. We appreciate the work
of Crescens and Titus; but
Demas forsook the Paul, he is an apostate.
That is not what the passage says.
We should be as gracious toward Demas as we would desire
one to be toward us, when in the face of much difficulty in a
specific area, we move to another area to preach the word. E-Mail the author: DFWILLIS@aol.com |